Psychiatric interview: objectives, structure, content, and process. Standardized assessment instruments in psychiatry

Psychiatric interview: objectives, structure, content, and process. Standardized assessment instruments in psychiatry

The psychiatric interview is psychiatry's main diagnostic tool and the start of treatment. This page covers what it sets out to do, its phases, the history and the mental state examination, risk, cognitive testing, the physical examination and investigations, the formulation, the skills that make it work, and the standardised instruments that support it.

At a glance

  1. The interview gathers the history and the mental state examination, assesses risk, builds the therapeutic relationship and ends with a formulation and a plan: in psychiatry it is the diagnostic test and the first treatment at once.
  2. It moves from open to closed questions: the patient's story in their own words first, then clarification, the background history and specific screening questions.
  3. The history covers the presenting complaint, past psychiatric and medical history, medication, substances, family history, personal history, forensic history, social circumstances and premorbid personality, with a collateral history from an informant where it can be had.
  4. The mental state examination describes, at the time of the interview, appearance and behaviour, speech, mood and affect, thought form and content, perception, cognition and insight.
  5. Every assessment asks directly about thoughts of suicide, self-harm and harm to others; asking does not put the idea in a person's head.
  6. A physical examination and basic investigations look for physical causes and the effects of illness and drugs, and the formulation explains why this person is ill now, by predisposing, precipitating, perpetuating and protective factors.
  7. Structured interviews (SCID, SCAN, MINI) and rating scales (PHQ-9, HAM-D, PANSS, AUDIT, MoCA and others) make assessment reliable and measure change, but a screening score is not a diagnosis.

Objectives

The psychiatric interview is where most psychiatric diagnoses are made: physical examination and tests play a smaller part than in other specialties, and the diagnosis rests on what the patient says, what the doctor observes, and the later course. It has several aims at once:

  • To make a diagnosis, or a differential diagnosis, with the evidence for and against each possibility.
  • To assess risk to the patient, to others and from others.
  • To understand the person, their history, circumstances, strengths and own explanation, for the formulation.
  • To begin the therapeutic alliance: a patient who feels heard is more likely to return, to tell the truth and to accept treatment.
  • To agree a plan, explain it, and give information and hope.

Structure

An assessment of an adult usually takes 45 to 90 minutes, and an emergency assessment is shorter and focused on the acute problem and risk, with the rest filled in later.

  1. 1

    Prepare

    Read the referral and the notes, especially past violence and risk. Tell a colleague where and whom you are seeing, and know the alarm. Arrange an interpreter if needed.
  2. 2

    Open

    Introduce yourself and your role, explain the purpose, the length and what you already know, and the limits of confidentiality. Ask whether the patient wants any companion present.
  3. 3

    Patient-led history

    Open questions about what has been happening. Listen, let the patient talk, and note the mental state as you go.
  4. 4

    Doctor-led history

    Clarify the symptoms (are these true hallucinations? does the mood vary through the day?) and screen the areas not yet mentioned: mood, anxiety, psychotic symptoms, substances, cognition, risk.
  5. 5

    Background

    Complete the past, family, personal, forensic and social history and the premorbid personality.
  6. 6

    Examine

    Complete the mental state examination, a cognitive test where indicated, and the physical examination.
  7. 7

    Close

    Summarise back to the patient, ask what has been missed, give your understanding of the problem, agree the next steps and the next contact. Leave about a quarter of the time for this.

The assessment goes on afterwards, with a collateral history from relatives, the general practitioner and old records (with consent, unless risk overrides it), nurses' observations and review as the illness evolves: every psychiatric diagnosis is to some degree provisional.

Content

The psychiatric history

HeadingWhat to ask
Identifying details and referralname, age, occupation, relationships, who referred and why now; legal status
Presenting complaintthe main problems, in the patient's own words
History of the presenting complaintonset, duration, course, severity, associated symptoms, precipitants, effect on work, relationships and self-care, treatment so far, the patient's own explanation
Past psychiatric historyprevious diagnoses, episodes, admissions (voluntary or compulsory), treatments and their effect, self-harm and suicide attempts
Past medical historyphysical illnesses, head injury, epilepsy, operations
Medicationcurrent and past drugs, doses, adherence, side effects, allergies, over-the-counter and herbal remedies
Substance usealcohol (units a week, pattern, signs of dependence), tobacco, illicit drugs, route and injecting, gambling
Family historya family tree: mental illness, suicide, substance misuse, relationships within the family
Personal historypregnancy and birth, development, childhood (separations, abuse), school, work history, relationships and sexual history, children, menstrual and obstetric history (episodes after childbirth)
Forensic historyarrests, charges, convictions, violence, outstanding charges
Social circumstanceshousing, money and debt, supports, a typical day, dependants, driving
Premorbid personalityhow the patient, and others, would describe them before the illness: mood, relationships, interests, coping, standards, beliefs

A collateral history matters most where insight or memory is impaired, in psychosis, mania, delirium, dementia and intoxication, and where the patient's account and the referral differ.

The mental state examination

The mental state examination is the psychiatric equivalent of the physical examination: an ordered description of the patient's experience and behaviour at the time of the interview, recorded with examples in the patient's own words. Much of it is observed during the history.

HeadingWhat is describedExamples of abnormality
Appearance and behaviourapparent age, dress, grooming, hygiene, weight, scars, eye contact, rapport, attitude, motor activity, abnormal movements, postureself-neglect, flamboyant dress in mania, agitation, retardation, catatonic signs, tremor and dyskinesia from drugs, responding to unseen voices
Speechrate, volume, tone, quantity, spontaneity, fluency, articulationpressured speech, slowed speech with long pauses, mutism, dysarthria, dysphasia
Mood and affectmood as the patient describes it (subjective) and as observed (objective); the range, reactivity and congruence of affectdepressed, elevated, irritable, anxious; flat, labile or incongruous affect
Thought formthe speed, flow and connection of thought, judged from speechflight of ideas, loosening of associations, tangentiality, circumstantiality, thought blocking, neologisms
Thought contentpreoccupations, worries, obsessions, overvalued ideas, delusions (type, conviction, how they are acted on), thoughts of suicide, self-harm and harm to otherspersecutory or grandiose delusions, delusions of guilt, intrusive obsessional thoughts
Perceptionhallucinations (modality, who speaks, what they say, commands), pseudohallucinations, illusions, depersonalisation and derealisationsecond- or third-person voices, visual hallucinations in delirium
Cognitionlevel of consciousness, orientation, attention and concentration, memory, an estimate of intelligence; a screening test where indicateddisorientation, inattention, poor recall
Insightwhether the patient sees the experiences as illness, explains them as such, and accepts treatment; graded full, partial or absentabsent insight in psychosis and mania

The psychopathology behind each heading is described in the psychopathology topics, from consciousness and psychomotor activity to thought and perception and memory. Disagreeing with the doctor is not in itself lack of insight: a patient can understand an illness fully and still decline a treatment.

Risk, in brief

Risk is assessed in every patient and recorded as a heading of its own: risk to self (suicide, self-harm, self-neglect), to others (violence, and the safety of children and other dependants) and from others (exploitation, abuse), with risks such as driving where they apply. Thoughts of suicide are asked about in steps, from hopelessness and thoughts that life is not worth living to thoughts of ending it, plans, preparations and past attempts, together with what keeps the person going.

Risk scales predict poorly. UK guidance on self-harm advises not using risk assessment tools or scales, or a rating of low, medium or high risk, to predict suicide or to decide who is treated or discharged; the assessment instead looks at each person's needs and risks and leads to a safety plan. The full assessment and management are in suicidal and aggressive behaviour.

Cognitive testing

A cognitive examination is needed whenever an organic disorder is possible: in older patients, with confusion, memory complaints, a first psychosis or a change in personality. It covers the level of consciousness, orientation, attention (months of the year backwards, serial sevens, digit span), memory (registering and recalling a name and address, recent and remote events), language (naming, repetition, comprehension, writing), visuospatial function (copying a figure, drawing a clock) and executive function (verbal fluency, abstraction, alternating hand sequences). A standard instrument gives it a score (see below). Poor attention points to delirium, a gradual decline in memory with a clear consciousness to the dementias.

Clock drawing and figure copying
Two sheets of cream paper side by side. On the left sheet, at the top, two printed pentagons overlap at their tips so that where they cross makes a small four-sided figure; below, on the left, a pencil copy, slightly uneven but with both shapes five-cornered and crossing in the same way, and on the right a poor pencil copy: a four-cornered shape and a five-cornered one, apart. On the right sheet, two pencil clocks. The upper one is whole: a circle, the numbers one to twelve evenly round it, and two hands from the centre, the short one just past the eleven and the long one on the two. The lower one has all its numbers crowded into the right half of the circle, twelve at the top and eleven near the bottom, and two hands of the same length pointing at the ten and the eleven.

Point at a name or a part to light it.

Copying a figure and drawing a clock test visuospatial and executive function, which a conversation can miss. In the MMSE the patient copies two intersecting pentagons, and scores a point only if all 10 angles are there and the two shapes intersect. In the MoCA the patient draws a clock with all the numbers and the time set to ten past eleven, one point each for the contour, the numbers and the hands.

Simplified: example drawings, not any patient's; one impaired clock shows two kinds of error at once; real clocks vary, and a single test never makes a diagnosis; only the MMSE's and the MoCA's own scoring is shown; other clock-drawing scales score in more detail.

8 sources
  1. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state": a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 1975; 12: 189–198.
  2. Nasreddine ZS. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): administration and scoring instructions, version 7.1 and version 8.1. MoCA Cognition.
  3. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2005; 53: 695–699.
  4. Rouleau I, Salmon DP, Butters N, Kennedy C, McGuire K. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of clock drawings in Alzheimer's and Huntington's disease. Brain and Cognition, 1992; 18: 70–87.
  5. Soffer M, Butters MA, Herrmann N et al. About time: neurocognitive correlates of stimulus-bound and other time setting errors in the Clock Drawing Test. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2024; 30: 471–478.
  6. Shulman KI. Clock-drawing: is it the ideal cognitive screening test? International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2000; 15: 548–561.
  7. Kumar and Clark's Clinical Medicine, 10th edition. Elsevier, 2021. Chapter 26, Neurology: dementia, bedside cognitive assessment.
  8. Semple D, Smyth R. Oxford Handbook of Psychiatry, 4th edition. Oxford University Press, 2019. Chapter 2, Psychiatric assessment (cognitive assessment instruments), and chapter 4, Neuropsychiatry (Alzheimer’s disease 1; Dementia with Lewy bodies).

Physical examination and investigations

The physical examination is part of every full psychiatric assessment, because physical illness can cause or worsen mental symptoms, mental illness and its drugs cause physical harm, and a baseline is needed before treatment. It records weight, body mass index, pulse and blood pressure, and looks especially at the neurological examination (extrapyramidal signs, tremor, gait, focal signs), signs of self-harm, injecting, liver disease, thyroid disease and malnutrition.

InvestigationWhenWhy
Full blood count, urea and electrolytes, liver function, thyroid function, glucose or HbA1cmost new patientsphysical causes, such as hypothyroidism in low mood, and baseline before drugs
Calcium, vitamin B12 and folate, lipids, prolactin; syphilis and HIV serologycognitive impairment, alcohol misuse, antipsychotic treatment, risk factorsreversible causes, metabolic monitoring
Urine drug screen, alcohol levelpsychosis, agitation, unexplained changesubstance-induced disorders
Pregnancy testwomen of child-bearing age before many drugsteratogenic drugs such as valproate
ECGbefore and during antipsychotics, with cardiac risk, on lithiumQTc prolongation, arrhythmia
Drug levelslithium, valproate, clozapinetoxicity, adherence
CT or MRI of the brainfocal signs, cognitive decline, atypical or late-onset presentations, head injurystructural causes
EEGsuspected epilepsy, delirium, non-convulsive status, Creutzfeldt-Jakob diseasenot as a screening test
Lumbar puncturesuspected encephalitis, including autoimmune encephalitisinfective and antibody causes

Formulation

The case is summarised in a formulation: a short synopsis, the differential diagnosis with the working diagnosis, the causes in this patient, a management plan and the likely prognosis. The causes are set out in the biopsychosocial model, crossed with the four Ps.

BiologicalPsychologicalSocial
Predisposing: why this personfamily history of schizophreniachildhood adversitymigration, urban upbringing
Precipitating: why nowheavy cannabis useexam stressleaving home
Perpetuating: why it continuesstopping the antipsychotic, ongoing cannabislack of insightisolation, unemployment
Protective: what helpsgood response to treatmentgood premorbid functioningsupportive family, a place at college

The example is of a young man with a first psychosis. The plan follows the same grid: immediate, short-term and long-term measures, each biological, psychological and social, with the perpetuating factors as the main targets.

Process

Setting and safety

  • A quiet, private room, chairs of the same height at an angle rather than across a desk, an easy way out for both doctor and patient, the alarm at hand and nothing that could be used as a weapon.
  • Violence is rare, and most risk is to the patients themselves, but it is thought about before every new interview; its best predictor is past violence.
  • Interpreters: a professional interpreter, ideally sharing the patient's culture, even when the patient speaks some of the language. Relatives interpret only in an emergency, and children are never used as interpreters.
  • Notes are made during or soon after the interview, dated and signed, with key symptoms in the patient's own words.
The interview room
A plan of a small room seen from above, its floor cream and its walls pale. Near the middle two apricot armchairs are turned towards each other at an angle, neither facing the other straight on; in the left one sits the doctor, a white clipboard on their knees, and in the upper right one the patient. A door opens in the left wall beside the doctor and another in the top wall beside the patient, each leaf swung into the room with its swing dashed. A desk with two sheets of paper stands against the bottom wall, away from the chairs, and a small red alarm button is set in the left wall beside the doctor.

Point at a name or a part to light it.

In psychiatry the patient does not face the doctor across a desk. Two comfortable chairs of the same height, turned towards each other at an angle, are less confrontational and still allow eye contact, and a clipboard lets the doctor write as they go. Ideally each has a door of their own; with one door, the doctor sits so that the patient is not between them and it. The alarm is found before it is needed, and anything that could be used as a weapon is taken out of the room.

Simplified: a plan seen from above: the chairs' equal height cannot show; the ideal room, with two doors; many rooms have one, and then the doctor sits nearer to it; only what the interview needs is drawn; a real room also keeps out anything that could be used as a weapon.

2 sources
  1. Semple D, Smyth R. Oxford Handbook of Psychiatry, 4th edition. Oxford University Press, 2019. Chapter 2, Psychiatric assessment (The clinical interview, Box 2.1; Setting the scene; Interviewing psychiatric patients).
  2. Bourke J. Liaison psychiatry. In Kumar and Clark's Clinical Medicine, 10th edition. Elsevier, 2021. Chapter 25, Box 25.2, Essentials of a safe psychiatric interview.

Interviewing skills

SkillWhat it isExample
Open questionsdo not suggest an answer, used first"How have you been feeling?"
Closed questionsclarify a detail"How many hours do you sleep?"
Avoiding leading questionsthe patient may agree to please"Is your mood better or worse at any time of day?", not "Is it worse in the mornings?"
Clarificationasking for an example"What do you mean by 'they'?"
Reflection and empathynaming the feeling heard"It sounds as if you've been very frightened."
Normalisingmaking a sensitive question ordinary"Some people under this much strain have thoughts of ending their life. Has that happened to you?"
Signpostingannouncing a change of topic"Now I'd like to ask about some unusual experiences I ask everyone about."
Facilitation, silence and summarisingnods, a pause that lets the patient go on, and a summary to check understanding and close a section"So, since March..."

A delusion is neither argued with nor agreed with: the doctor acknowledges how real and distressing it is for the patient and explores it. Some patients need their own approach: the agitated (safety, a calm voice, a shorter interview), the mute (observe, offer writing, think of catatonia and physical causes), the intoxicated (reassess when sober unless there is an emergency), the manic and over-talkative (polite, firm interruption and closed questions) and the cognitively impaired (simple questions, hearing aids and glasses, an informant).

Standardised assessment instruments

Instruments make assessment more reliable, help screening, measure severity and show change with treatment. They come in three kinds: structured diagnostic interviews, clinician-rated scales and self-report questionnaires. A fully structured interview asks fixed questions in a fixed order and can be used by trained lay interviewers; a semi-structured one leaves the clinician to probe and judge.

Diagnostic interviews

InstrumentWhat it is
SCID-5 (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5)semi-structured, clinician-administered, for DSM diagnoses; clinician, research and personality disorder versions
SCAN (Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry)the WHO's semi-structured interview, built round the Present State Examination, for ICD-10 and DSM diagnoses
MINI (Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview)short structured interview, about 15 to 30 minutes, for the common ICD and DSM disorders
CIDI (Composite International Diagnostic Interview)fully structured, for lay interviewers in population surveys

Rating scales

AreaInstrumentTypeWhat it measures
DepressionPHQ-9self-report, 9 items, 0 to 27severity over 2 weeks: 5, 10, 15 and 20 mark mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe; 10 or more suggests clinically significant depression; item 9 asks about thoughts of death or self-harm
HAM-D (Hamilton)clinician-rated, usually 17 itemsseverity and change, the standard in drug trials; not diagnostic
MADRS (Montgomery–Åsberg)clinician-rated, 10 items, 0 to 60severity, sensitive to change
HADSself-report, 14 items, anxiety and depression subscales of 0 to 21screening in medical patients; avoids physical symptoms
EPDS (Edinburgh Postnatal)self-report, 10 itemsdepression in pregnancy and after childbirth
Anxiety and OCDGAD-7self-report, 7 items, 0 to 21severity of generalised anxiety; 10 or more suggests a disorder
Y-BOCS (Yale–Brown)clinician-rated, 10 items, 0 to 40severity of obsessions and compulsions in known OCD
ManiaYMRS (Young)clinician-rated, 11 itemsseverity of mania
PsychosisPANSSclinician-rated, 30 items (7 positive, 7 negative, 16 general), 30 to 210severity and change in schizophrenia
BPRSclinician-rated, 18 itemsbroad psychotic and non-psychotic symptoms
SubstancesAUDIT10 items, 0 to 40alcohol use: 8 or more suggests hazardous or harmful drinking, 20 or more possible dependence; AUDIT-C is its 3-item short form
CAGE4 yes or no questions2 or more suggests an alcohol problem
CIWA-Arclinician-rated, 10 items, up to 67severity of alcohol withdrawal, to guide symptom-triggered benzodiazepines; local protocols set the threshold for treatment
Cognition and deliriumMMSE30 pointsglobal cognition; 24 or more usually normal; weak for mild and executive impairment, and depends on education
MoCA30 points, about 10 minutesmore sensitive to mild cognitive impairment; below 26 is abnormal, with a point added for 12 years of education or fewer
ACE-III (Addenbrooke's)100 points, five domainsattention, memory, fluency, language, visuospatial; for dementia, 88 is the usual sensitive cut-off and 82 the specific one
4AT4 items, under 2 minutesdelirium: 4 or more suggests possible delirium, 1 to 3 possible cognitive impairment
CAM (Confusion Assessment Method)clinician algorithmdelirium: acute onset and fluctuating course with inattention, and either disorganised thinking or an altered level of consciousness
GCS (Glasgow Coma Scale)3 to 15level of consciousness
OtherBush–Francis Catatonia Rating Scaleclinician-rated, 23 itemscatatonia; 2 or more of the first 14 items is a positive screen
AIMS, Barnes Akathisia Scale, Simpson–Angusclinician-ratedtardive dyskinesia, akathisia, parkinsonism from antipsychotics
HoNOS, WHODAS 2.0, CGIclinician-rated or self-reportoutcome, disability and global severity; others screen for eating disorders (SCOFF) and bipolar disorder (MDQ)

Check yourselfAnswer, then say how sure you were: a lucky guess still counts as a weak point.

1A 30-year-old woman is referred by her general practitioner with low mood. After you have introduced yourself and explained the purpose and length of the interview, how do you best begin?

2Which of these findings belongs in the mental state examination rather than in the history?

3A 45-year-old man in primary care completes the PHQ-9 and scores 14 out of 27. What does this score mean?

4The family of a 78-year-old retired engineer describe two years of gradually worsening forgetfulness and difficulty managing his finances. He scores 28 out of 30 on the MMSE. What is the best next step?

5A 22-year-old student is admitted with a first psychotic episode. His uncle has schizophrenia, he began smoking cannabis heavily a month before the onset, his family is supportive, and since discharge he has carried on smoking daily and stopped his antipsychotic. In a formulation, which of these is a perpetuating factor?