Suicidal and aggressive behaviour in mental disorders: risk assessment and therapeutic management
How to assess and manage the risk that a person with a mental disorder will harm themselves or others. Suicide and self-harm in Europe, the assessment after self-harm, why risk scales are not used to predict suicide, safety planning and follow-up; the risk factors for violence, structured professional judgement, and the steps from de-escalation to rapid tranquillisation, with the law in brief.
- 19 min read
- 5 questions
- Checked 26 Oct 2026
Contents7 sections
At a glance
- Suicide kills more than 720,000 people a year worldwide and about 48,000 in the EU, three in four of them men. Self-harm is many times commoner, peaks in young women, and is the strongest predictor of suicide: about 1 in 25 people seen in hospital after self-harm die by suicide within five years.
- Most people who die by suicide have a mental disorder: depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, substance use, personality disorder, anorexia nervosa. Risk is highest after self-harm and in the first weeks after psychiatric discharge.
- After self-harm every patient has a psychosocial assessment: intent, planning, lethality, precautions against discovery, final acts, feelings now, mental state and supports. Risk scales and low, medium or high ratings are not used to predict suicide or to decide who is treated.
- Management is a safety plan made with the patient, restricting access to the means, treating the disorder, a short CBT-informed psychological intervention, small supplies of dangerous medicines and follow-up within days.
- Most people with a mental illness are never violent. Past violence predicts it best; substance misuse, untreated psychosis with threat or control symptoms and dissocial personality add to it. Risk is judged by structured professional judgement such as the HCR-20.
- Aggression is met with de-escalation, then oral medication, then rapid tranquillisation (intramuscular lorazepam, or haloperidol with promethazine after a normal ECG) and monitoring. Restraint and seclusion are last resorts, brief and within the law.
Suicidal behaviour
Suicide is death from an act a person carried out to end their own life. Around it lie commoner behaviours that overlap with it:
| Term | What it means |
|---|---|
| Suicidal ideation | thoughts of ending one's life, from passive (wishing not to wake up) to active (thinking how to do it) |
| Suicide attempt | a non-fatal act carried out with at least some intent to die |
| Self-harm | intentional self-poisoning or self-injury, whatever its motive or the degree of intent; the usual term in the UK and much of Europe, and it includes suicide attempts |
| Non-suicidal self-injury | repeated injury to the body's surface, such as cutting or burning, without intent to die, often to relieve unbearable tension; a condition for further study in DSM-5-TR |
| Suicidal behaviour | attempts and suicide; DSM-5-TR can record a current or past episode |
Self-harm is many times commoner than suicide, and most of it never reaches a hospital, yet it is the strongest single risk factor for suicide.
| Self-harm | Suicide | |
|---|---|---|
| Who | adolescents and young adults, girls and women more than boys and men | men three to four times as often as women; rates rise in middle and old age |
| Methods | self-poisoning in more than three in four hospital presentations in England, often paracetamol or the person's own prescribed drugs; cutting | hanging is the commonest method in most European countries, then poisoning, jumping and, where guns are common, firearms |
| Intent | absent, mixed or uncertain: to escape, to show distress, to relieve tension | to die |
How common it is
- from suicide worldwide, in 2021
- 720,000deaths a year
- the EU's age-standardised suicide rate in 2023
- 10.4per 100,000
- in the EU are men
- 3 in 4suicides
- seen in hospital after self-harm die by suicide within five years
- 1 in 25people
In 2023 the EU recorded 48,370 suicides, about 1 in 100 deaths; the rate has fallen from 12.2 per 100,000 a decade earlier. It ranges from 18.8 in Lithuania, then Slovenia and Hungary, to 3.5 in Cyprus, with Greece and Malta also low, and recording practices explain part of the gap. Suicide is the second commonest cause of death at 15 to 29 in the EU, after accidents, and three quarters of the world's suicides happen in low- and middle-income countries.
After hospital-treated self-harm, about 1 in 6 people harm themselves again within a year and about 1 in 60 die by suicide within a year, the risk highest in the first weeks.
Mental disorders and suicide
Studies that reconstruct the lives of people who died by suicide find a mental disorder in about 9 in 10 in Europe and North America, fewer in Asia, and many had seen a doctor in the month before. Risk is higher when disorders coexist, especially with substance misuse. The lifetime figures below are old, often quoted estimates; a Danish register study that followed people from their first hospital contact found about 4 to 8 per cent in mood disorders and schizophrenia, highest in men with bipolar disorder.
| Disorder | Risk and what raises it |
|---|---|
| Depression | about 6 per cent lifetime in mood disorders; hopelessness, guilt, psychotic depression, agitation and insomnia; early recovery, when energy returns before mood |
| Bipolar disorder | among the highest of all disorders, in depressive and mixed episodes; long-term lithium lowers it |
| Schizophrenia | about 4 per cent lifetime; young men early in the illness, with insight, depression and hopelessness, and after discharge |
| Alcohol dependence | about 7 per cent lifetime; intoxication at the time of many suicides; later in the course, after losses of work, partner or health |
| Borderline personality disorder | repeated self-harm and long-standing suicidal thoughts, with impulsive and sometimes lethal attempts, more so with depression or substance misuse |
| Anorexia nervosa | among the highest mortality of the mental disorders; about 1 in 5 of its deaths is a suicide |
In a stress–diathesis model, a lasting vulnerability (genes, early adversity, impulsivity, hopelessness) meets a stressor such as a loss or a relapse. Low serotonin function was an early and much-repeated biological finding, reported in Stockholm in 1976 in people who had made violent attempts (neurobiology).
Risk and protective factors
| Kind | Factors that raise the risk |
|---|---|
| Personal and social | male sex; middle and older age; separated, divorced, widowed or living alone; unemployment, debt, homelessness; prison, especially the first days; occupations with access to means (doctors, vets, farmers); a family history of suicide; sexual and gender minorities |
| Clinical | previous self-harm or attempt, the strongest; any mental disorder, above all with substance misuse; hopelessness; chronic pain or a disabling or newly diagnosed physical illness; recent admission or discharge; poor engagement with care |
| Current | a recent loss, humiliation or separation; a legal or financial crisis; intoxication; agitation, severe insomnia, impulsivity; a plan and access to lethal means; the suicide of someone close or in the news |
Protective factors weigh against them: close relationships and responsibility for children (especially in women), reasons for living and plans for the future, religious or moral objections, problem-solving and the ability to ask for help, engagement with a trusted clinician, and no access to lethal means.
Assessing suicide risk
Every patient with a mental disorder is asked about suicidal thoughts, as are medical patients after a loss, a serious diagnosis or self-harm. It is a conversation in private, part of the psychiatric interview, moving from the general to the specific; family, the GP and records add what the patient cannot or will not say.
| Ask about | For example |
|---|---|
| Hope | "How do you see the future?" |
| A passive wish | "Do you ever feel life isn't worth living, or wish you wouldn't wake up?" |
| Active thoughts | "Have you thought of ending your life? How often, how strongly, and can you push the thoughts away?" |
| A plan and the means | "Have you thought how you would do it? Could you get hold of it?" |
| Preparations | "Have you done anything to get ready, such as saving tablets or writing a note?" |
| The past | "Have you ever tried to end your life, or harmed yourself?" |
| What holds them back | "What has stopped you so far?" |
After self-harm
- 1
Treat the body
The injury or poisoning is treated first, with the timing and amount of every substance taken. A paracetamol overdose can look harmless for a day and needs a timed level and treatment by protocol (paracetamol poisoning). A patient who refuses treatment has their capacity assessed. - 2
Assess early
A mental health professional sees the patient as soon as they are alert enough to take part, without waiting for medical treatment to finish. - 3
Understand the act
What happened, why and with what intent, how the person feels about it now, and what was going on in their life. - 4
Formulate and plan
What drives the risk, what makes it worse or better, and what happens next, agreed with the patient and shared with the GP and the team that follows them up.
| About the act | What raises concern |
|---|---|
| Intent | wanted to die, and still does |
| Planning | thought out over hours or days rather than on the spur of the moment |
| Lethality | a violent or dangerous method such as hanging, jumping or a firearm; a belief that the act would kill, whatever its medical effect |
| Precautions against discovery | done alone, where and when no one was expected; told no one |
| Final acts | a note or message, a will, giving away possessions, settling affairs, saying goodbye |
| Afterwards | did not seek help; found by chance |
| Feelings now | disappointed or angry to have survived; a continuing wish to die; hopelessness |
It goes on to the mental state, past self-harm, mental disorders and substance use, whether the precipitant has passed, relationships, work, money and the law, strengths and supports, and any risk to others, such as children at home.
Why risk scales are not used to predict
Suicide is rare even among high-risk patients, while its risk factors are common, so a scale that adds them up flags many who will never die by suicide and misses many who will. In a meta-analysis, 5.5 per cent of psychiatric patients rated high risk died by suicide over about five years, against 0.9 per cent of those rated lower, but nearly half of the suicides came from the lower-risk group. A low-risk label can withhold care that is needed; a high-risk label can bring restriction that is not.
UK guidance since 2022 therefore says that risk assessment tools and scales, and global ratings of low, medium or high risk, are not to be used to predict suicide or repetition, or to decide who is offered treatment or discharged. The assessment focuses on the person's needs and safety, with a risk formulation every time. Scales such as item 9 of the PHQ-9 can structure questions or follow change, but they do not decide care.
Managing suicide risk
Safety first
A patient with active suicidal intent is not left alone, and the means are removed. Admission is considered when the person cannot be kept safe at home or a serious disorder such as psychotic depression needs treatment; it is offered voluntarily first, with compulsory admission when they refuse and the legal criteria are met. Admission does not remove risk: wards remove ligature points, set observation from checks every 15 minutes to a nurse within arm's length, and watch for patients leaving.
The safety plan
A safety plan is written with the patient, kept by them and shared, with consent, with family and the team. A plan of this kind, with telephone follow-up after an emergency visit, cut the odds of suicidal behaviour by almost half over six months in a large study in US veterans' emergency departments.
- 1
Warning signs
The thoughts, feelings, situations and behaviours that come before a crisis. - 2
Coping alone
What the person can do by themselves to get through the urge: distraction, calming, getting to a safe place. - 3
People and places
People and social settings that take the mind off it, and family or friends who can be asked for help. - 4
Professional help
The numbers of the mental health team, out-of-hours and crisis services, and emergency services. - 5
A safe environment
Removing or locking away the means, agreed with the person and, where they consent, the family.
Restricting the means
Restricting lethal means is among the best-proven ways to prevent suicide, because many suicidal crises are brief and many people do not switch methods. Smaller packs of paracetamol in the UK since 1998 were followed by 43 per cent fewer paracetamol deaths over 11 years; bans on toxic pesticides, fewer guns at home, barriers at bridges and, historically, detoxified domestic gas worked too. For the patient this means weekly supplies of dangerous medicines, avoiding the most toxic (tricyclic antidepressants, opioids), and asking family to hold medicines or remove guns.
Treating the disorder and the person
- The underlying disorder is treated: depression, psychosis, substance misuse. Lithium lowers suicide in mood disorders and clozapine lowers suicidal behaviour in schizophrenia. Antidepressants can raise suicidal thoughts in the first weeks in people under 25, so young patients are seen often early on.
- A structured, CBT-informed psychological intervention made for people who self-harm, such as CBT or problem-solving therapy, typically over 4 to 10 sessions, is offered to adults; dialectical behaviour therapy suits repeated self-harm with emotional instability.
- No drug is given as a specific treatment to reduce self-harm.
- Social problems are tackled, from debt and housing to relationships and abuse.
Follow-up
The risk is highest in the weeks after self-harm and after discharge from a psychiatric ward, and above all in the first week. Under UK guidance, people who have self-harmed and about whom there are concerns are seen within 48 hours of the assessment, and in England patients leaving a psychiatric ward are contacted within 72 hours. Appointments are made before the person leaves, and missed ones are followed up.
Aggressive behaviour
Most people with a mental illness are never violent, and they are far more often victims than perpetrators. Severe mental illness does raise the risk: in Sweden about 1 in 20 violent crimes was committed by people with a severe mental illness. Schizophrenia without substance misuse doubles the odds of violence, and with it raises them about ninefold, so most of the excess comes from drugs and alcohol. The victims are most often family, carers and staff.
Risk factors
| Kind | Factors |
|---|---|
| History | previous violence, the best single predictor, especially if serious, recent or repeated; conduct disorder in childhood; criminal history; victim of abuse |
| Illness | substance misuse and intoxication; untreated positive symptoms, especially persecutory delusions with anger and feelings of threat or of being controlled by an outside force; morbid jealousy; command hallucinations to harm; mania with irritability; poor insight and stopping treatment |
| Personality | dissocial personality disorder and psychopathy; impulsivity and anger |
| Situation | young men; early in an admission, often when leave is refused or the patient is detained; specific threats against a named person; access to weapons and to the victim; loss of support, homelessness, stress |
Acute aggression has organic causes that must not be missed: delirium, intoxication with alcohol or stimulants, withdrawal from alcohol or benzodiazepines, dementia, head injury, hypoglycaemia, hypoxia. New aggression in someone never aggressive before needs an organic cause ruled out, above all in an older or physically ill patient.
Assessing the risk of violence
Unstructured judgement is unreliable, and actuarial scales of fixed historical factors cannot show what to change. Structured professional judgement sits between them: the clinician rates a fixed list of evidence-based factors, then judges what risk, to whom, when and in what circumstances, and plans how to manage it.
The HCR-20, in its third version, is the most widely used tool, in forensic and general settings across Europe:
| Part | Items | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Historical | 10 | violence and other antisocial behaviour, relationships, work, substance use, major mental disorder, personality disorder, trauma, violent attitudes, response to treatment |
| Clinical | 5 | recent insight, violent ideation or intent, symptoms of major mental disorder, instability, response to treatment |
| Risk management | 5 | future professional services and plans, living situation, personal support, response to treatment and supervision, stress and coping |
The ratings lead to a formulation, risk scenarios (what could happen if things went as before, better or worse) and a plan. On wards, short daily checklists such as the Brøset Violence Checklist (confusion, irritability, boisterousness, verbal and physical threats, attacking objects) help staff act before an incident.
Violence may be close when there are threats and a raised voice, pacing, staring, clenched fists, invading personal space, or the patient says they feel threatened or out of control. Such a patient is seen in a room with an alarm and a clear exit for both, with colleagues aware; a weapon or a hostage is a matter for the police.
Managing aggression
Aggression is managed in steps, using the least restrictive measure that will work and moving up only when it has failed.
- 1
Prevention
Enough staff, activity and privacy; care plans that know the patient's triggers; listening to grievances; treating illness, pain and withdrawal. - 2
De-escalation
One member of staff leads, calmly, at a safe distance, acknowledging the anger, offering choices, a drink or a quiet room, without threats or argument; others stay close but out of sight. - 3
Oral medication
Offered as part of de-escalation: a benzodiazepine such as lorazepam, or, in psychosis, an antipsychotic the patient knows, or promethazine. - 4
Rapid tranquillisation
Medication by injection, usually intramuscular, when oral medication has been refused or has failed and urgent sedation is needed. The aim is calm, not sleep. - 5
Restraint and seclusion
Only by trained staff, as a last resort, for the shortest time. - 6
Afterwards
Physical monitoring, a debrief for patient and staff, and a review of the care plan.
Point at a name or a part to light it.
Aggression usually builds: a trigger, then escalation, with rising tension, raised voice and pacing, then the crisis, when control is lost, then recovery and a low after it. Each phase calls for its own response. Prevention and early de-escalation, while arousal is still rising, are the most effective and the least restrictive; medication by injection, restraint or seclusion is a last resort at the crisis; and a debrief afterwards, for patient and staff, helps prevent the next incident.
Simplified: arousal has no scale and the phases are not drawn to time: an incident can build over hours or erupt in seconds; the assault cycle is a teaching model; many incidents do not follow it, and some come without warning; the steps overlap: de-escalation goes on through every phase, and most incidents end without anything restrictive.
3 sources
- Kaplan SG, Wheeler EG. Survival skills for working with potentially violent clients. Social Casework, 1983;64(6):339–346.
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Violence and aggression: short-term management in mental health, health and community settings (NG10), 2015.
- Semple D, Smyth R. Oxford Handbook of Psychiatry, 4th edition. Oxford University Press, 2019. Chapter 23, Difficult and urgent situations.
Rapid tranquillisation
| Choice | When | Watch for |
|---|---|---|
| Lorazepam intramuscularly, 1 to 2 mg (less in older people) | when no ECG has been done, there is heart disease or a long QT, the patient has never had an antipsychotic, or the cause is intoxication or withdrawal | respiratory depression, reversed with flumazenil; over-sedation; disinhibition |
| Haloperidol 5 mg with promethazine 25 to 50 mg, intramuscularly | psychosis, in a patient who has had antipsychotics before and has a normal ECG | a long QT interval and arrhythmias; acute dystonia, treated with intramuscular procyclidine; neuroleptic malignant syndrome; hypotension |
| Olanzapine 10 mg intramuscularly, where available | psychosis, as an alternative to haloperidol | hypotension and bradycardia; not within an hour of intramuscular lorazepam, as together they can depress breathing and the circulation |
UK guidance makes the first two rows the first choices; if lorazepam partly works a second dose is considered, and if it fails, haloperidol with promethazine. A dose is repeated only after the first has been reviewed, at 30 to 60 minutes, within the daily maximum counting oral doses. Haloperidol is not given intravenously for this.
After rapid tranquillisation the pulse, blood pressure, respiratory rate, temperature, hydration and level of consciousness are checked at least every hour until there are no concerns, and every 15 minutes if the maximum dose was exceeded, or the patient is asleep or sedated, intoxicated, physically ill or was harmed during restraint. Deaths have happened during rapid tranquillisation and restraint.
Restraint and seclusion
Manual restraint by trained staff is used only to prevent serious harm or to give urgent medication. One person leads and protects the head and neck, and the airway and breathing are watched throughout. No pressure is put on the neck, chest or abdomen, and the prone position is avoided or kept brief, because restraint has caused deaths from positional asphyxia, more so in obesity, stimulant intoxication and after rapid tranquillisation. UK guidance advises against routine restraint for more than 10 minutes. Seclusion, supervised confinement alone in a room, is kept for detained patients who are a severe danger to others, with regular review.
Practice differs across Europe: mechanical restraint with belts is still widely used in continental Europe, in Germany, Switzerland, Denmark and Norway among others, but not in general UK practice, and Iceland gave it up decades ago. In Germany, since a 2018 ruling of the Federal Constitutional Court, five- or seven-point fixation for more than about half an hour needs a judge's approval and one-to-one supervision.
The law in brief
European countries have mental health laws that allow a person with a mental disorder to be admitted and treated against their will under strict conditions; the details differ from country to country:
- The usual criteria are a mental disorder, a risk to the person's health or safety or to others, treatment that cannot be given less restrictively and, in some countries, impaired capacity.
- An independent body reviews the decision: a court in much of Europe (in France a judge, within 12 days), a tribunal in the UK.
- Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights protects liberty, and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities presses for less coercion.
- In an emergency, a doctor may act to prevent immediate serious harm under the doctrine of necessity (common law in the UK), and confidentiality can be broken to protect others from serious harm.
In England and Wales, detention is under the Mental Health Act 1983. The Mental Health Act 2025 reforms it, but its changes are being brought in over about ten years and most were not yet in force in 2026. The main sections are section 2 (assessment, up to 28 days), section 3 (treatment, up to 6 months, renewable), section 5(2) (holding a voluntary inpatient for up to 72 hours) and section 136 (police removal to a place of safety). The Mental Capacity Act 2005 covers other decisions; Scotland and Northern Ireland have their own laws.
Check yourselfAnswer, then say how sure you were: a lucky guess still counts as a weak point.
1A 24-year-old woman is medically fit after taking 20 paracetamol tablets following an argument with her partner. She phoned her sister straight afterwards and says she is glad to be alive. The emergency team asks for a risk score to decide whether she can go home. What is the right approach?
2Which feature of a recent overdose most strongly suggests serious suicidal intent?
3A 52-year-old man with severe depression is discharged after a three-week psychiatric admission for suicidal thoughts. When is his risk of suicide highest, and what follows from it?
4A 30-year-old man with a first episode of psychosis is shouting and throwing chairs on the ward. Calm talking has failed and he refuses oral medication. He has never taken an antipsychotic and no ECG has been done. Which rapid tranquillisation is most appropriate?
5Which is the strongest predictor of future violence in a man with schizophrenia?